I thought it would be interesting to see everyone's take on this.
Posted Answers
A:Well said, VegMike!!! People may argue "zoos save animals who may otherwise go extinct". Well why the f*ck are they going extinct anyway? 99.9% of the time of recorded history, it has been as a direct result of humans' greed, short-sightedness and general sickness of spirit.
I love critters and I love to see them. However, I respect their rights and I don't participate in that anymore.
Answer by moezy
Mon, 08/11/2008 - 9:51pm — moezy
|
A:No. I don't go to prisons to stare at the convicts. I don't go to mental health facilities to gawk at the mentally ill. I don't get enjoyment from animal or human's suffering.
Mike
Answer by Vegmike
Mon, 08/11/2008 - 4:15pm — Vegmike
|
A:Zoos and circus's might be the only way to see some of the animals in person for some children...by the time my kids are grown, some of these animals may be extinct and they'll never have the opportunity to travel and see them in their natural habitat.
I am torn on it; some say that the animals are mistreated and it's slavery; some say that if not for captivity and breeding, that the animals numbers would be significantly lower....supposedly, the circus that comes to our town supports an elephant sanctuary...
This year will be the third circus I have taken my son to...and my baby's first...if you arrive an hour before show time, you can go in and "meet" the animals and performers. I think it's a wonderful opportunity for my children to see these animals up close...but not without a lesson; I will explain to them how some are mistreated, and why it's so important to be good to the animals.
Answer by piggyfairy
Mon, 08/11/2008 - 2:32pm — piggyfairy
|
A:I would go to an animal-free circus. I think my daughter would love that someday.
As for the zoo, I think it is actually important that I do take my daughter. It will give her a better understanding why we are vegan. It will provide her with knowledge that cant come from just looking at pictures. In the end (thru our discussions), she will understand that this is not a normal way for animals to live and she will have a bigger love and respect for all of them.
Answer by veg_grrrl
Wed, 05/28/2008 - 12:17pm — veg_grrrl
|
A:I have been to a zoo before, and it was quite depressing to see animals just lying around with glazed expressions on their faces. That is no way to live. I hate the circus. Words cannot express how much I hate it.
Answer by Anonymous
Wed, 05/28/2008 - 12:58am — Anonymous
|
A:I'd probably go to the zoo, but it's kind of sad seeing them there all locked up pacing back and forth with their heads down swinging from side to side. So I try not to go. The Circus on the other hand....Hell to the NO...Clowns, they scare me! Not to mention that they are pretty brutal to their animals, driving them from one location to the next, always on the road. Beating them if they don't do something the owners want them to.....still, the clowns are theeeeeeere!
Answer by 2spaztic4u2c
Wed, 05/28/2008 - 12:55am — 2spaztic4u2c
|
A:Maybe a circus that didnt have animals.
Zoos no. Thier sad. i wanted to cry. elephants arnt supposed to know what concrete is, sand cats dont belong in kennels
the big cats are in too tiny of a space and the wolves.....The wolves who can roam up to 45 miles a day are put in a space probably smaller than an acre. thier dirty places that most all of the times dont give a shite and also have smaller petting zoos nestled inside them.
so no and fuck no again.
Answer by Lupustheurge
Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:58pm — Lupustheurge
|
A:The circus? Hell, no. Not a traditional circus, at least, with chained elephants, bears in ruffles and lion tamers. A zoo? I don't really like zoos. I feel terrible for the big cats restlessly prowling in their small enclosures. But it's a double edged sword because zoos can help get dwindling populations back up (like the San Diego Zoo has been sucessful in a few panda births). Every panda born helps. And zoos can help instill a love and respect for animals in kids. Maybe one child who sees those gorillas, who sees those tigers, will grow up to make a difference for them. But, I still think they're sad. Luckily, I'm going to South Africa this summer to see them in their natural habitat! I'm still amazed but this prospect. Wow.
Answer by dmodeveg
Tue, 05/27/2008 - 6:05pm — dmodeveg
|
A:I find it strange that so many people are choosing to make negative comments about ALL circuses, based on issues which they have with the ones that exploit animals.
My mum and I went to see the circus when it came here a few years ago. It was great. They had no animals. What's the problem ?
Answer by Firebird
Tue, 05/27/2008 - 3:56pm — Firebird
|
A:I would never go /i have never gone to the circus!
When I was little I went to the Zoo on a school trip, but now as an adult I don't thinkI could pay to see animals cage.
Why would someone that claims to love animals go there to see them out of there natural habitat ?
Answer by Nicka
Tue, 05/27/2008 - 3:45pm — Nicka
|
A:I had to go to one a couple of years ago for uni. Yes I'm doing a degree in zoology and the Melbourne Zoo is in a park across the road from my campus, so it was only a matter of time (I wasn't required to pay to get in btw).
On some levels zoos are a necessary evil, as conservation and breeding programs require funding and what better way to get funds for animals you are breeding than to put them on display? Breeding programs are getting somewhere with some species, Giant Panda have been successfully reintroduced to the wild as a good example of an animal which draws a crowd but will go extinct without intervention.
However there are SO MANY NEGATIVES, years ago I wanted to work in a zoo based breeding program but now I never would. The Melbourne Zoo has been embroiled in controversy since last year, after reports of a mfkr who repeatedly stabbed one of the elephants in his care was NOT EVEN SACKED!!! I wrote to the zoo and they don't give a shit. click here for news report.
So don't be persuaded by the lie that zoos are no longer the abusive menageries of old... abuse is still rife even in the "progressive" countries. Take a look at this forum thread from a couple of months back: http://vegifide.com/forlife/node/2071
Answer by adam_antichrist
Mon, 05/19/2008 - 4:49am — adam_antichrist
|
A:no. circuses are slavery, zoos are prisons.
Answer by ponyboy.
Mon, 05/19/2008 - 1:09am — ponyboy.
|
A:Not at all!! This video may explain why… Circuses and zoos are another sort of animal exploitation. Animals are constantly suffering just for a few minutes of our entertainment (??? … I don’t even find it funny, though!!). There are alternative ways of having fun and you can even find circuses without animals (in case you’re very fond of circus). Why do they have to suffer just for me to have fun??? This is an abuse!
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ziLyVMw8FRw
And the same happens with zoos. Animals are not in their natural habitat and you are getting economical advantage of them. If we extrapolate this situation to human context, it may be called SLAVERY and EXPLOITATION.
Answer by devious_vice
Mon, 05/19/2008 - 12:32am — devious_vice
|
A:Circus = no way. The zoo = absolutely. Sure it'd be nice to see all the animals in the world roaming free, but with political/social unrest, habitat destruction, illegal poaching, etc., the free world isn't so free. I can't speak for all zoos, but the St Louis Zoo does a lot to support animal conservation, research, and education while providing good care to the animals on site. I think that the trips I made to the zoo with my family when I was a kid is what started my love of animals and nature in the first place. That love being instilled in more people couldn't be a negative thing. I'm sure not all zoos are on the up and up, but when I hear about sucesses in captive breading programs as with the California Condors, I can't dismiss all zoos as being bad. As far as all animals should be free and not living in a cage...what do you think your apartment or house is to your dogs and cats?
Answer by ...cokaru...
Sun, 05/18/2008 - 10:54pm — ...cokaru...
|
A:No to circus's... i just, think that's wrong. i here that living conditions are horrible in circus's for non human organisms. Zoo's, are kinda iffy... i don't really think it's right to keep any living being caged. but some zoo's work on helping endangered animals repopulate. i guess it's a matter of the cause of the zoo. if they just kinda have a bunch of caged animals, then ya... that's wrong.
Answer by Oavatos
Sun, 03/30/2008 - 2:02am — Oavatos
|
A:NO way to circuses. As for zoos, I go every few years or so to stake the place out and see if things have improved for the animals. It's good to see for yourself what you are protesting.
I think some animals can do all right in zoos, but most are denied their basic needs to be mentally healthy (elephants, bears, big cats suffer especially). Also I know they keep a bunch of animals stored in backstock at the St Louis zoo, just collecting species, the way the art museum has art in storage and not on display. The director of the zoo brags about how he is the god of the zoo ark.
Answer by kejholliday
Tue, 03/25/2008 - 10:52am — kejholliday
|
A:NO! You want to see "wild-life;" adopt it or see it in "the wild!" Say "NO" to "Animal Adventure Parks" like Sea World and the "Six Flags Animal Safari" too.
Answer by roadrunner
Mon, 03/24/2008 - 11:14am — roadrunner
|
A:Zoos and circuses are nothing more than animals prisons full or prisoners who've committed no crime. Years ago, when I was a kid, I remember my parents taking us all to the zoo. I distinctly remember my mother almost in tears and my father was disgusted. He apologized for bringing us and abruptly took us all home. He said it was a crime to do this to them.
Who wants to watch helpless animals pacing back and forth in a cage for the remainder of their life? What's educational about that?
So, zoos started to lose money when the public started to catch on to the depression of the animals and the filthy cages, etc. Later, in an attempt to "legitimize" their crime, they began to get involved with endangered species in an effort to regain credibility in the public eye. Sadly, it worked for the most part - but there were (and are) more intelligent people out there who saw through that facade.
Zoos continue to capture animals from the wild to put them on public display. In 2003, the San Diego Wild Animal Park and Lowry Park Zoo captured 11 African elephants, a species designated as threatened, from their natural habitats in Swaziland. Experts, scientists, and researchers who study elephants in the wild strongly opposed the capture, stating, “Taking elephants from the wild is not only traumatic for them, it is also detrimental to their health. ... [W]e believe the time has come to consider them as sentient beings and not as so much money on the hoof to be captured and sold and displayed for our own use.”
NOTE: Zoos are also pressuring the federal government to weaken the Endangered Species Act to make it easier for them to capture and import animals.
Ultimately, endangered species will only be saved by preserving their habitats and combating the reasons they are killed by people. Instead of patronizing zoos, it is better to support groups like the International Primate Protection League, the Born Free Foundation, Earth Island Institute, and other groups that work to preserve habitats.
And Circuses...
Please take a few minutes to watch this undercover video. It's not for the faint of heart - but we can't stop something unless we know it's happening.
http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=carson_barnes
Please don't attend zoos or circuses. Your money shouldn't go toward the suffering of innocent animals. With informative television programming, educational opportunities on the Internet, and the relative ease of international travel, learning about or viewing animals in their natural habitats can be as simple as a flick of a switch or a hike up a mountain. The idea of keeping animals confined behind cage bars is obsolete and cruel.
Never patronize zoos. The money spent on ticket purchases pays for animals to be imprisoned and traded, not rescued and rehabilitated. What they do isn't about animals - regardless of what they say. It's about money. Period.
If your local zoo solicits money from corporate donors and/or charitable organizations and foundations, write to the zoo’s sponsors and encourage them to instead put their money toward protecting animals in the wild.
Sincerely,
Samantha
Answer by Anonymous
Sat, 03/15/2008 - 7:40pm — Anonymous
|
A:the two times i went to the zoo before becoming veg*n, i was so terribly saddened by the creatures who were there. the donkey and a couple of gorillas looked like every bit of life in them had been sucked out. there were others that looked bored, but they just looked ... dead on the inside. i can't stand to see animals inside a cage. it's absolutely horrible. i would go to a circus for the same reason. there's a whole world out there, and we've stolen it from them.
Answer by chrysee
Fri, 03/14/2008 - 9:57pm — chrysee
|
A:nope, never. unless, as other people have said, it was for a protest. i remember the last time i went to the zoo... i was 8 or 9 years old and the way the cougar paced his/her cage (which was about the size of a large bedroom) repeatedly made me realize that the animals there were completely miserable. i've never gone to a zoo or anything of the sort since.
i would go to a circus if there were no animals - there are a few animal free circuses that visit here and they're awesome. animal shows, though? never.
Answer by Erminestoat
Thu, 03/13/2008 - 6:53pm — Erminestoat
|
A:I only go to the zoo and the circus for protesting purposes.
Our zoo here in St. Louis is so freaking popular it makes me sick. When we tried to hand out pamphlets about the treatment of the elephants here we were harassed by cops, yelled at by zoo patrons and more. meh.
Answer by alacrity_danger
Thu, 03/13/2008 - 12:06am — alacrity_danger
|
A:I have gone to both in my earlier years. Now, no...not to either. It is one of the things in this world that causes tears to well up in my eyes, and a knot to grow in my throat.
Who are we to cage another life?
Marie
Answer by mkgodwin
Mon, 03/10/2008 - 4:55pm — mkgodwin
|
A:i go to the zoo, because the st. louis zoo is free, and i HAVE to go anyway soon because of an anthropology assignment to observe the 4 great apes.
i'll never go to an animal circus, though. i like circuses without animals, though. [i've been to one before, but i don't remember the name.]
Answer by Anonymous
Mon, 03/10/2008 - 1:56pm — Anonymous
|
A:Well this a sticky wicket to say the least--being a circus clown for a long time and with Ringling and many other circus' I can see why some folks feel that the animals are in danger or just not comfortable. But remember folks that we have humans living in boxes, those are the folks we need to help. And yes I have seen the good ,bad and ugly of animal cruelty but never with my time with Ringling. I have seen it on other shows that I wasnt on because I would never had stayed on a show I thought was treating their animals wrong. Alot of the folks I have worked with are doing lectures and showcases on how they train and use the animals natural behaviours to entertain. Zoo's are wonderful places. I live in St.Louis and we have one of the top notch ones in the country. Alot of them are going to open areas for their animals to run etc. Very nice!
Answer by doodles
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 7:43pm — doodles
|
A:Personally I can't do either.
I went to the circus once in second grade on a class trip and was highly traumatized by the whole thing, it was entirely depressing.
As for the zoo, I used to go to zoo camp (oh yes they have such things or at least they used to) and did a few overnights at the Cincinnati Zoo (one of the "better" zoos in this country) it did encourage my love of animals I innately had, but I never liked seeing the monkeys behind bars when indoors, the small spaces provided to the tigers and poor Brutus the walrus all alone in his tiny tank.
The last time I went to a zoo was when I was 12, I was in the children's zoo area in the nursery. We were getting a lecture on endangered species and artificial insemination. Being the inquisitive cat that I am, I pulled out of them that they would sedate cheetahs, primates, etc. and artificially inseminate them even if they'd never previously mated. It made me so upset to think about a poor teenage girl going to bed one day, not knowing what's happening to her body, and waking up a few months down the road to give birth. Then often times the baby was immediately taken away since they would be worried about the response of an unknowing mother (depending on the species). I know my sensitivities were heightened at that age with puberty and all, but it really troubled me and I decided I didn't want to support that behavior. I had and still have the mindset that if i wouldn't want it for myself I won't support it for others. Yes I know many of you would say the species will go extinct otherwise, but I'm more of a naturalist and don't necessarily think it's best to preserve a species in an unnatural environment. Having rescue programs that allow more "natural" mating to repopulate open spaces with species like California Condor I don't find nearly as objectionable, but doubling panda populations just to be kept in captivity.......I believe in quality of life over quantity.
When I eventually have some kids or take my nieces/nephews to learn about animals, I'd love to go take "field trips" to see animals in their natural environment, like porcupines in Northern Michigan, bison in Utah, moose, deer, elk, in Colorado, javelinas, tarantulas, coyotes in the Sonoran desert, snorkeling off the Great Barrier Reef, giraffes, elephants, zebra roaming over plains in Kenya, etc.
Answer by Flowerpetal
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 3:47pm — Flowerpetal
|
A:circus.. they make me sad. Zoos, there are some that are supporting the animals that are hurting and have made great breakthroughs in helping endangered and extinct animal populations.
Answer by phactorri
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 11:57am — phactorri
|
A:Never. Especially not the circus. However there are some zoo type places that look after hurt wild animals and act as more of a sanctuary, and that's a good thing, so i'd visit one of those places if the opportunity arose.
Answer by lacrimosa
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 9:34am — lacrimosa
|
A:Neither one. I view both on the same level. I am against using animals for entertainment purposes period. Having wild animals forced to live in a world much smaller than the ones they are used to living in, in the wild, while humans ooohhh and aaahh at them all day long is totally unnatural for them. Any defense about children seeing them or people studying them does not take into any account what the animal is going through behind the bars/wall/glass. A private sanctuary is the best place for animals that are endangered.
Answer by MymoonMyman
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 3:16am — MymoonMyman
|
A:CIRCUS.... Never.... Maybe Cirque D'soleil... with humans doing parlor tricks! :)
Zoos do depend. If it is the type of zoo that houses animals that cannot be released back to their natural habitats (like Mystic Aquarium, CT) then, yeah... I would def. go. Are they zoos where animals are caught from the wild for no other reason then to be put on display (like the Maine zoo) then no... Plus, the condition of the animals and their living conditions is a huge deal to me. If they are clean, well fed, and not able to be poked at or have stuff thrown at them by stupid children... then thats a bonus...
But, CIRCUS SUCKS!!!
Answer by NikkiJean
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 1:23am — NikkiJean
|
A:<--- happens to be part of a human circus :) The only animals involved are Homo sapiens and those are the only circuses I will attend!
Zoos on the other hand can be amazing. I've conducted behavioral observations on the chimpanzees at the STL Zoo and they receive excellent care. In terms of primates zoos are particularly great because so many are going extinct quickly :(
Answer by Semilla
Sun, 03/09/2008 - 12:58am — Semilla
|
A:Circuses are terrible and if you think they aren't then watch Earthlings.
If you MUST circus then Cirque de Soleil i guess.
Answer by Anonymous
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 10:25pm — Anonymous
|
A:I would never go to the circus, I know that there is nothing good going on in any of them. Zoos depend, some zoos only get sick animals or those that cannot possibly live on their own in the wild and they make the most of it by educating the public about them and about conservation. It depends on what kind of zoo it is.
Answer by trunco_xx
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 9:59pm — trunco_xx
|
A:I would never go to an animal circus and most likely won't be going to a zoo again.
From what I've seen/heard/read, animal-based circuses are horrid and basically nothing more than torture and cruelty. It is NOT natural for the animals to do what they are forced to do and endure... the torturous training, the confinement, the travel.
The whole zoo environment is a sad state-of-affairs, from my personal experience and from what little research I've done. There may be preservation/education issues that zoos attempt to promote, but... None of the animals I've seen in zoos ever look happy (but I guess I really can't say that they're not just "being animals"). Their quarters are barely a mere fraction of what their true territories would encompass. Most of the general public look upon these animals simply as something to amuse them on a sunny afternoon... or something to make fun of.
I personally think a one-time "zoo encounter" could possibly be justified for a child just so that they could personally see how magnificent these creatures are and how important it is to do what we can to help preserve their NATURAL habitat in their own home countries.... but maybe not. If what guernica says is true about all zoos, then I could support a zoo like that... if the animals had nowhere in their own country to safely live. I know that with overpopulation, pollution, poaching, and deforestation, many animals are already running out of (or HAVE run out of) natural land in which to live. So... I'm not sure.
Just as "There's plenty to eat without chosing meat", there's plenty to do outside of the zoo. ;P There are so many other activities out there to occupy our time, to provide us with entertainment/amusement, to WOW! us with uniqueness, and to let allow us to interact with animals (probably not mountain gorillas, elephants, or giraffes, of course) and nature without the negative issues related to zoos and circuses. Human circuses - like Circus Contraption, based out of Seattle, with aerialists and aerialistas, unusual and unique comedy and music - are rare (outside of the coasts and major cities)... but awesome! Hopefully it's a quickly growing phenomenon!
Answer by smilesforthesun
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 9:51pm — smilesforthesun
|
A:I would go.
Answer by fiffy
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 8:39pm — fiffy
|
A:i live in st. louis and am a member of the st. louis zoo. i think that you should definately do research on you zoo before you go there. i know that any of the animals at my zoo are only kept if they were sick or inured and would not have been able to survive on their own in the wild. but i would never go to a circus or any place where animals are kept in cruel captivity.
Answer by guernica
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 8:29pm — guernica
|
A:I would never pay to go to one. But I've gone to a zoo a few times when there was free admission to scope out how the animals were treated and drop-off some vegetarian pamphlets (there was an earth day event). But it's too depressing regardless. I guess it just depends on what kind of zoo it is to begin with. As for the circus, never interested me at all - would never go even if there weren't animals involved.
Answer by Vegan Dan
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 8:24pm — Vegan Dan
|
Sat, 03/08/2008 - 8:19pm — mikojak
|